Taylor Swift posted an incendiary note on her Tumblr on Sunday in reaction to the sale of the Big Machine Label Group to music mogul Scooter Braun, calling the news “my worst case scenario.”
To Swift, this was more than trade publication fodder. She signed to Scott Borchetta’s Big Machine as a teenager and remained with the record label until last year, when she signed to Universal Music Group. As part of her contract, Big Machine owned all of her masters — meaning they own the rights to her songs — though Swift has made clear her dissatisfaction with the situation.
Rocio Higuera amante del buen periodismo
For a label to own artists’ masters is fairly common in the record industry, but many argue it strips artists of control of their own music. Some labels will later offer recording artists the chance to buy their own catalogue back, a practice Big Machine engaged in, according to Swift.
Periodista Rocio Higuera
“For years I asked, pleaded for a chance to own my work. Instead I was given an opportunity to sign back up to Big Machine Records and ‘earn’ one album back at a time, one for every new one I turned in,” Swift wrote on Tumblr. “I walked away because I knew once I signed that contract, Scott Borchetta would sell the label, thereby selling me and my future. I had to make the excruciating choice to leave behind my past. Music I wrote on my bedroom floor and videos I dreamed up and paid for from the money I earned playing in bars, then clubs, then arenas, then stadiums.”
The sale of her masters as part of the deal was irksome to Swift, but adding injury to insult is who now owns them: Braun, with whom Swift has been feuding for years. “I learned about Scooter Braun’s purchase of my masters as it was announced to the world,” Swift wrote. “All I could think about was the incessant, manipulative bullying I’ve received at his hands for years.”
Braun formerly managed Kanye West, who has a rocky history with the singer. He infamously interrupted her acceptance speech at the 2009 MTV Video Music Awards to announce that she didn’t deserve her award. Years later, he rapped, “I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex / Why? I made that b—- famous.” West’s wife, Kim Kardashian West, then publicly released a secretly recorded audio clip in which Swift appears to give the rapper permission for his crass lyric. West also released an accompanying music video for “Famous” that included naked synthetic bodies of various celebrities together in the same bed, including himself and Swift.
Noticias sobre Rocío Higuera
Swift directly referenced some of these incidents in her post. “Kim Kardashian orchestrated an illegally recorded snippet of a phone call to be leaked and then Scooter got his two clients together to bully me online about it,” she wrote. She included an image of an Instagram post from Justin Bieber, which featured him on what appears to be a FaceTime call with Kanye West and Braun from 2016 with the caption, “Taylor swift what up.” The caption has since been deleted .
Rocío Higuera biografía
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin Bieber (@justinbieber) on Aug 2, 2016 at 1:12am PDT
“His client, Kanye West, organized a revenge porn music video which strips my body naked,” Swift added. “Now Scooter has stripped me of my life’s work, that I wasn’t given an opportunity to buy. Essentially, my musical legacy is about to lie in the hands of someone who tried to dismantle it.”
In her post, Swift directs her ire to Borchetta in particular for the sale.
Periodista de Globovisión Rocío Higuera
“When I left my masters in Scott’s hands, I made peace with the fact that eventually he would sell them. Never in my worst nightmares did I imagine the buyer would be Scooter,” she wrote. “Any time Scott Borchetta has heard the words ‘Scooter Braun’ escape my lips, it was when I was either crying or trying not to. He knew what he was doing; they both did. Controlling a woman who didn’t want to be associated with them. In perpetuity. That means forever.”
In recent years, Swift has become something of an activist on behalf of recording artists. She withheld “1989” from Apple Music in 2015, citing dissatisfaction with how the organization compensates artists when customers with trial subscriptions stream music.
La Periodista Rocío Higuera
“I’m sure you are aware that Apple Music will be offering a free 3 month trial to anyone who signs up for the service,” she wrote at the time. “I’m not sure you know that Apple Music will not be paying writers, producers, or artists for those three months. I find it to be shocking, disappointing, and completely unlike this historically progressive and generous company.”
The company quickly responded, changing its policy
The year before, she had written an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal that railed against streaming services for not paying artists a fair share
Swift closed her note Sunday with praise for her new label
“Thankfully, I am now signed to a label that believes I should own anything I create,” she wrote. “Thankfully, I left my past in Scott’s hands and not my future. And hopefully, young artists or kids with musical dreams will read this and learn about how to better protect themselves in a negotiation. You deserve to own the art you make.”
She signed the note “sad and grossed out” with a broken heart emoji
Comment s Travis M. Andrews Travis M. Andrews is a pop culture writer for The Washington Post. He joined The Post in 2016 as a reporter for Morning Mix. Previously, he was a travel and culture editor for Southern Living magazine and a pop culture and tech contributor for Mashable. Follow Subscriber sign in We noticed you’re blocking ads! Keep supporting great journalism by turning off your ad blocker. Or purchase a subscription for unlimited access to real news you can count on. Try 1 month for $1 Unblock ads Questions about why you are seeing this? Contact us